The Goal Behind the Integration of European Criminal Systems Essay - 1

The Goal Behind the Integration of European Criminal Systems - Essay Example As the study outlines relatively unrestricted movement of people has in turn resulted in rising instances of cross-border crime. This is apparently the second most important goal in integration. Another major area of concern is terrorism. Even though such acts can be classified under crime, Klip has specifically stated this aspect as one of the goals that need a unified criminal law. The inflow of foreign nationals and subsequent European citizenship has resulted in a relatively undisturbed movement between member states for them. Those people intent on committing crime have the option to travel freely to another member state. If apprehended, the question as to which country’s law takes precedence will be an issue. This is especially true if the culprit is apprehended in their own host country for a crime committed in another member state. This study highlights that to a layperson, there is no apparent difference between the two terms. But in legal parlance, these two terms are different in their evolution and practice. It should be noted that both civil and common law systems are based on justice, but have some fundamental differences. One of the primary differences in the country or region of origin of both these systems. Civil law is said to have originated in Rome while common law is based on English court judgments. Civil is based on codified or specific parameters that govern judicial decisions. In other words, countries that follow civil law depend mostly on these codified predefined laws to enforce judgments. Civil laws have their basis in the constitution and the laws passed by the parliaments of a nation-state. Common law, on the other hand, is a system where judicial precedence is given importance.