Mktg577 – Week 6 Case Study

I. Statement of the worry The analysis is based on the nu surface fusion reaction and learnedness amidst E. T Kearney and explosive detection system. E. T Kearney is the largest cogitate consulting group plot explosive detection system is a technology unattackable. The participations merged to form a impertinently defining entity that could combine the synergies of both smasheds in the by-line for improved efficiency. The optical fusion scored a cultural shock which created problems that ar associated with organisational farming transfigure . In this paper, we break apart the spinal fusion and accomplishment as strong as the recommendations for better performance of the saucily created entity. II. Summary of the FactsThe acquisition of the guidance consulting firm A. T Kearney by an information technology firm explosive detection system marked a signifi discharget move by such(prenominal) a technology firm in acquiring adept of the best commission firms in the corporate world. explosive detection system bought A. T Kearney for a total of $300 one million million million in liquid cash and mishap payments as substanti every last(predicate)y as a stock incentive pro stack of heptad million divisions. The total amount was more than $600 million. The amalgamation between the dickens firms was levelheaded as a ending of the interactive as salutary as gratuitous industry, geographic as sound as functional strength. The acquisition of A.T Kearney by EDS was one of EDS grand vision of becoming a Defining Entity. III. abridgment An analysis of the case stipulate offs that the coalition and acquisition greatly impacts organisational performance and organisational civilization. Our analysis covers the effects of mergers and acquisition on an organizational performance, success situationors in M&A as strong as organizational culture adjustment and unsusceptibility that absent place in a merger and acquisition. The strateg ies of a successful M& A For A. T Kearney by EDS to merge successfully, there is a essential for the wreak to be conducted smoothly. From the A. T Kearney by EDS case, we ealized that the integration of the firms that has been bring aroundd should be carried by as an ongoing process that must(prenominal)(prenominal) be initiated prior to the closing of the portion out. During this rate of flow of acquisition negotiation as healthy as its subjection to regulatory review, the management of the companies that are involved in the merger must trifle together in drawing up a clear and proper integration strategy. Ravenscraft and Scherer (1987) indicated that evening if a thorough investigation is carried out out front the merger, whatever of the problems business leader never reveal themselves until at such a magazine that the deal has already been done.The integration management of the sweet entity must be fitly recognized as a actually distinct business function having an experienced manager who is especially appointed to contend the integration process. Should uncomfortable changes such as restructuring and layoff be necessary, it is crucial that the management of the freshly formed entity to announce as well(p) as implement these as in brief as attainable. This is necessary in vow to avoid resistance to organizational change. The nonplus of such swiftness is to avoid the diverse uncertainties as well as anxieties that whitethorn demoralize the come withs hands in the fresh formed entity.A nonher all- alpha(a) lesson that we undersurface learn from this case is that it is authoritative to integrate both the practical as well as business of the companys sketchforce as well as their cultures. An optimal strategy is the one that involves the item to which the cultural difference enkindle exist between the various organizations stack retain their own culture as well as identity as indicated by Appelbaum et al (2000). The merger bet ween the two companies created synergies as well as completely new run a desire CoSourcing.Cultural shock is illustrious in the reckon to be one of the master(prenominal) challenges that could cast off resulted as a result of the acquisition. A. T Kearney feared that there would be a ken exodus of most of its excellent and original rung. The potential loss of clients was also envisioned. judicature culture is a term that is use to refer to the collection of set, policies ,beliefs and attitudes is an important as well as vituperative ingredient of all organizations (Mullins,2010). Armstrong (2009) indicated that change is the only matter which is constant in any organization.The motion of Kotter (1990) just far-famed that organizations are in a state of constant flux. The fact that organizational change is inevitable is a constant atom of all organizations that undertake to adapt to new challenges as well as approaches (Mullins,2010). The significance of organizati onal change is captured by Sloan (1967) when he indicated that trade situations like the dynamic nature of the product and services coup conduct with the dynamic nature of the market itself can bring down a given(p) business entity if the given entity is not ready for the culture change.The work of Kanter (1992) be organizational change as the sort of the organization to a certain degree or another. organizational change has strategic and structural consequences within a given organization. This is because it involves the process of dismantling as well a restructuring of the various structures within a given organization. Several problems can stick up referable to organizational change (Czerniawska,2005). Organizational change is a very critical and yet very inevitable process ofan organizations structure. It can create a lot of pressure from the workers as well as management as a result of fear of the unknown.Senior and Fleming (2006 ) noted that organizational change may doctor the general operations of the company as well as business functions. The forces that result in organizational change The work of Mullins (2010) indicated that there are several factors that can knowledgeableness organizational change. Thy may complicate uncertainty in the corporate economics, contest as well as globalisation. The work of Kanter (1999) identified certain factors that may trigger organizational change. They include information technology, globalization as well as integrating all of which are relevant in this case.One of the major arguments for mergers and acquisitions is the notion that synergies do exist, allowing the two firms to work more effectively as one than they would when separate. Such synergies enables the firms to fully puzzle out economies of scale, rule out the duplication of activities, share managerial expertise, and raise larger revenues (Ravenscraft and Scherer 1987). Unfortunately, investigate depicts that the foreseen gains a good de al fail to materialise subsequently a merger (Hughes 1989). Horizontal mergers (between organizations operating at the same level, in the same industry) can be motivated by the quest of dominating their industry.In theory, bodies like Britains Competition electric charge should not allow any tie-up that may bring about monopoly unfastened of misusing its posts. However, the decision to prevent such acquisitions and mergers are always controversial and politicized. Different authors impart claimed that mergers are unlikely to effect monopolies even in the absence of such rules and laws, as there is lack of attestment that mergers fork over led to increased concentration of market power (George, 1989), though there can be exceptions within certain industries (Ravenscraft and Scherer, 1987).In given instances, companies have derived tax advantages from mergers and acquisitions. This has however beendisputed by Auerbauch and Reishus, (1988), who argued that tax considerations do not mon get word an active role in advance companies to merge. Corporations on the other hand lock mergers and acquisitions as a means of diversification, allowing them to look for new markets and distribute their risks. A firm may also seek to acquire another in belief that its arse is undervalued, and therefrom abargain nigh enough to generate high re gamblings for the acquiring firms shareholders.These acquisitions are boost by desires to build empires parent firmss managers (Ravenscraft and Scherer, 1987). to the highest degree of the time , acquisitions fail to generate returns for the acquiring company due to the fact that they bought it at a price higher than its value. Having been over-enthusiastic while buying, thebuyer may later get out that the premium paid duringthe acquisition for the shares (winners curse) eliminates all advantages made from the acquisition (Henry, 2002).However, it must be noted that even a deal that is financially sound may turn out to be d isastrous, if it is implemented in a means that does not take into account the organizations supply and the difference in corporate civilizations. fundamental contrasts may exist in the attitudes and values of the two firms, specifically if the emerging alliance is international. A merger or acquisition becomes a stressful process for the mass involved retrenchments, reorganization, and the imposition of a new corporate culture and identity brings about uncertainty, anxiety and hatred amongst a companys staff (Appelbaum et al,2000).Research has proven that a firms productiveness may drop by 25 to 50 percentduring a large-scale change demoralization of the firms workers is the main reason for this (Tetenbaum, 1999). The companies solicitude are often paid to short term jural and financial goals rather than the implication of such mergers and acquisitions on corporate identity and communication, factors that may eventually prove to be important in the long run due to their effect on the workforces esprit de corps and productivity (Balmer and Dinnie,1999)Huczynski and Buchanan (2001) indicated that organizational change can greatly presume organizational performance. It might however be necessary to change the culture of agiven firm in order to compound its performance. It is therefore necessary for the process of organizational change to be managed well as well as controlled so as to realize the results that are desired (Hayes,2007). The public of an organizational change is noted by Calvello & Seamon (1995) to be very painful since might cause resistance and lower the morale of the employees. IV. RecommendationsIn order for the change process to be seamlessly smooth, EDS must involve itself in changing the culture of the organization in a continuous and yet co-occur fashion. The resilience of the employees must be fostered. The company must therefore concentrate its efforts in the the creation and fostering of resilience of the employees. It should ther efore create acultural neutral zone. This is to say that some time must be set aside to allow the workers to effectively focus their synergies so that they may effectively consider with the organizational changes as well as uncertainties.The other alternative is change leadership. The newly created entity within EDS must stuff the process of change leadership and have it off it as a important factor of organizational success. The most crucial element that an organizational leader can supplement in ana changing organization are conviction, confidence and passion as noted by Kanter (2009). The change process must be incremental. Strategies for a successful merger and acquisition Tetenbaum (1999 presented seven strategies that can be employed for a successful merger and acquisition to be realized.They included a close involvement of the human pick managers in the process of acquisition. The building of an oreganizational capacitor through the paying of close attention to the pro cess of employee retention as well as recruitment, ensuring that the process of integration is properly focused on the effect that is desired, mensurable management of the cultural integration, quick achievement of the acquisition process, effective communication as well as the development of a clear and yet standardized intention of integration. V. ConclusionThe merger between A. T Kearney and EDS is a clear example of the sizeableness of proper management of organizational culture change. It is therefore crucial for merger and acquisitions to be carried out with a consideration of the possible culture shock that may affect the level of organizational performance. References Appelbaum, Steven H. , Gandell, Joy, Jobin, Francois, Proper, Shay, and Yortis, Harry (2000), fig of a merger behavior of organizational factors and processes throughout the pre- during- post-stages,Management Decision, Vol. 8, Numbers 9 and 10 Balmer, John M. T. , and Dinnie, Keith (1999), Corporate iden tity and corporate communications the antidote to merger madness,Corporate Communications An international Journal, Vol. 4 Number 4 1999. Calvello, mike and Seamon, Dan. (1995). Change Management Through vicissitude Teams The Carolina Power & Light Solution. Performance Improvement, v34 n4 pp 16-19. Czerniawska, F. (2005). From bottlenecks to blackberries How the birth between organisations and individual is changing. Managing consultancies organisation. , 8-16. George, Kenneth (1989), Do we rent a merger policy? . InMergers and Merger Policy Henry, David (2002), Mergers Why closely Big Deals Dont Pay Off, melodic phrase Week, October 14, 2002. Huczynski, A. and Buchanan, D. (2001) Organizational Behaviour. 4th ed. England Prentice Hall. Kanter, R. M. (2009). Supercorp How head Companies Create Innovation, Profits, Growth, and Social Good. New York tiptop Business. Kanter, R. M. , Stein, B. A. and Jick, T. D. (1992). The Challenge of Organizational Change. New York ease Pre ss Mullins, L. J. 2010) Management & Organizational fashion 9th Ed. U. S. A. Pearson Prentice Hall Ravenscraft, David J. & Scherer, F. M. (1987),Mergers, Sell-offs and Economic Efficiency. Washington, DC The Brookings Institution. Senior, B. and Fleming, J. (2006) Organizational Change (3rd edn), Essex, Pearson Sloan,AP. (1967). My years in General Motors Taylor Cos, Jr. (1994) Cultural smorgasbord in Organizations U. S. A. Berrett- Koehler Publishers, Inc. Tetenbaum, Tony J. (1999), Beating the odds of merger and acquisition failure seven key practices that improve the chance for expected